Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Early Adolescence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Observation and Action Instruction to Facilitate Conditional Reasoning Performance in Early Adolescents

David S. Lane, Jr.

Oklahoma State University

Early adolescent students (mean age=ten years, two months) received two 50-minute periods of instruction designed to increase their conditional syllogistic performance. The instructional method incorporated a logic board utilizing a Venn diagram format, blocks, and cards which illustrated all 16 conditional syllogisms. The study elaborated on an earlier work which had successfully utilized the instructional method. The action group children moved the block themselves into the correct areas of the logic board while the observational group children moved no blocks. Shortterm, longterm, and transfer performances were assessed using written 16-item conditional reasoning tests; performance of instructed children was compared to a group of non-instructed children. Results again confirmed that the basic instructional method is a viable way to positively affect early adolescents' reasoning performance. The differences between the action and observational groups' performance were not siginificant suggesting that moving blocks is not an important aspect of the instructional method. Because research indicates that conditional reasoning is difficult for children to master, these results take on practical significance.

The Journal of Early Adolescence, Vol. 3, No. 4, 335-347 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0272431683034006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
D. S. Lane Jr. and N. J. Campbell
Performance of Adolescents Following Instruction in Conditional Reasoning: A Six-Month Follow-up
Journal of Adolescent Research, October 1, 1986; 1(4): 417 - 430.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
D. S. Lane Jr.
Systematic Investigation of Critical Variables within a Conditional Reasoning Instructional System Used with Preadolescents
The Journal of Early Adolescence, June 1, 1986; 6(2): 155 - 171.
[Abstract]