This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Parkhurst, J. T. Articles by Hopmeyer, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity

Two Distinct Dimensions of Peer Status

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Andrea Hopmeyer

Occidental College

Sociometric popularity is computed based on peer liking and dislike. The relation between sociometric popularity and perceived popularity, based on peer identification of school associates considered popular, was investigated in a sample of 727 middle school students (7th and 8th grades). Most sociometrically popular students were not high on perceived popularity. Most students high on perceived popularity were not sociometrically popular Perceived popularity was correlated more highly with a measure of dominance than was sociometric popularity. Sociometrically popular students who were not high on perceived popularity were characterized by peers as kind and trustworthy but not as dominant, aggressive, or stuck-up. Students who were high on perceived popularity but not sociometrically popular were characterized as dominant, aggressive, and stuck-up but not as kind and trustworthy. Sociometrically popular students who also were high on perceived popularity were characterized as kind, trustworthy, and dominant but not as aggressive or as stuck-up.

The Journal of Early Adolescence, Vol. 18, No. 2, 125-144 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0272431698018002001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Kwon and A. M. Lease Children's Social Identification With a Friendship Group: A Moderating Effect on Intent to Conform to Norms Small Group Research, December 1, 2009; 40(6): 694 - 719. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Rancourt and M. Prinstein Peer Status and Victimization as Possible Reinforcements of Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Weight-Related Behaviors and Cognitions J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 10, 2009; (2009) jsp067v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Rodkin and C. Berger Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender International Journal of Behavioral Development, November 1, 2008; 32(6): 473 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. B. Estell, M. H. Jones, R. Pearl, R. Van Acker, T. W. Farmer, and P. C. Rodkin Peer Groups, Popularity, and Social Preference: Trajectories of Social Functioning Among Students With and Without Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2008; 41(1): 5 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females International Journal of Behavioral Development, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 76 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, and N. A. Card The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills International Journal of Behavioral Development, March 1, 2007; 31(2): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. W. Farmer, E. M.Z. Farmer, D. B. Estell, and B. C. Hutchins The Developmental Dynamics of Aggression and the Prevention of School Violence Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2007; 15(4): 197 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. H. de Bruyn and A. H. N. Cillessen Popularity in Early Adolescence: Prosocial and Antisocial Subtypes Journal of Adolescent Research, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 607 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Sandstrom and A. H.N. Cillessen Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2006; 30(4): 305 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Andreou Social Preference, Perceived Popularity and Social Intelligence: Relations to Overt and Relational Aggression School Psychology International, July 1, 2006; 27(3): 339 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Prinstein, C. S. Meade, and G. L. Cohen Adolescent Oral Sex, Peer Popularity, and Perceptions of Best Friends' Sexual Behavior J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2003; 28(4): 243 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Estell, T. W. Farmer, R. B. Cairns, and B. D. Cairns Social relations and academic achievement in inner-city early elementary classrooms International Journal of Behavioral Development, November 1, 2002; 26(6): 518 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. W. Farmer Misconceptions of Peer Rejection and Problem Behavior: Understanding Aggression in Students with Mild Disabilities Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 2000; 21(4): 194 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. W. Farmer, P. C. Rodkin, R. Pearl, and R. Van Acker Teacher-Assessed Behavioral Configurations, Peer-Assessments, and Self-Concepts of Elementary Students with Mild Disabilities Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1999; 33(2): 66 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. W. Farmer, E. M.Z. Farmer, and D. M. Gut Implications of Social Development Research for School-Based Interventions for Aggressive Youth with EBD Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 1999; 7(3): 130 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]