Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Early Adolescence
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Resnicow, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Finding Common Ground

On the Marriage of Evaluation and Demonstration Programs

Ken Resnicow

Emory University

Jan Kirby

Center for Substance Abuse Prevention

In recent years, some federal agencies thatfund demonstration research have required increasingly greater rigor with regard to study design and evaluation. The lines between research and demonstration programs have become blurred. Although a shift to a more research-orientedparadigm has considerable merit, it also should be acknowledged that many aspects of demonstration programs pose challengesfor evaluators. Aflndamental question is whether the program drives evaluation or the evaluation drives the program Other relevant issues include lack of clarity regarding the relation between program and evaluation, professional gaps between research and program staff lack of perceived benefitfor evaluation on the part of staff and clients, and communitydistrustofevaluators and research. Potential solutions offered include improving communication and trust between program staff, research personnel, and clients; enabling program staff to use evaluation data as a clinical tool; and increasing the number of positive indicators assessed.

The Journal of Early Adolescence, Vol. 17, No. 1, 10-20 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272431697017001003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
L. Ferrer-Wreder, C. C. Lorente, W. Kurtines, E. Briones, J. Bussell, S. Berman, and O. Arrufat
Promoting Identity Development in Marginalized Youth
Journal of Adolescent Research, March 1, 2002; 17(2): 168 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]